<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging is over rated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosiesherry.com/posing/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosiesherry.com/posing/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/</link>
	<description>Building my world as I walk (and click) in it</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: zenbullets</title>
		<link>http://rosiesherry.com/posing/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>zenbullets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosiesherry.com/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>But when a "blogger" becomes a "friend/acquaint" they leap from 30% to 83%. And surely people don't follow the blogs of sources they don't trust ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But when a &#8220;blogger&#8221; becomes a &#8220;friend/acquaint&#8221; they leap from 30% to 83%. And surely people don&#8217;t follow the blogs of sources they don&#8217;t trust &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby Davy</title>
		<link>http://rosiesherry.com/posing/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosiesherry.com/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Point 1 - I guess it depends what the purpose of your blog is.

Point 2 - if a "friend"/colleague or "friend of a friend" reviews a product on their blog (which is often how these things work), it becomes a trusted and accessible source.

Prattling now - 99% of people can get caught by sweeping statements and reductionist research. Substitute "blog" for "piece of paper" and see if it still makes sense.

Early days innit.

Agree passionately with your point about passion v noise. Rock on there Rosy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point 1 - I guess it depends what the purpose of your blog is.</p>
<p>Point 2 - if a &#8220;friend&#8221;/colleague or &#8220;friend of a friend&#8221; reviews a product on their blog (which is often how these things work), it becomes a trusted and accessible source.</p>
<p>Prattling now - 99% of people can get caught by sweeping statements and reductionist research. Substitute &#8220;blog&#8221; for &#8220;piece of paper&#8221; and see if it still makes sense.</p>
<p>Early days innit.</p>
<p>Agree passionately with your point about passion v noise. Rock on there Rosy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://rosiesherry.com/posing/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosiesherry.com/2008/05/blogging-is-over-rated/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Bingo, you got it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo, you got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
